Evaluation of mud crack geometry in sedimentary facies of Holocene fine grain sediments (Case Study; Voshmgir dam reservoirs in Gorgan)

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Hamed Rezaei
• Arash Amini

Golestan University

10.22067/sed.facies.v9i1.38710

Abstract

Intoduction
Mud cracks are primary polygonal structures that are formed by extension strains during drying period. Major factor in the formation of cracks are humidity and temperature. Quality and quantity of clay minerals, topoghraphy, sediments size, depth of cracks, water salinity and bioturbation are also important in crack,s distribution patterns. Studies have shown that cracks are lattice type in gentle slope areas and rectangular type in elevated slopes. Crack,s width and length, components size, and fractal characteristics are environmental factors in cracks distribution patterns.

Materials and Methods
Fifty samples were collected from four studied regions of Voshmgir dam reservoir, north of Gorgan (S1-S4). Geometrical characteristics of cracks were determined. Samples analyized for granoulometry aspect, using hydrometry method, liquid limit identifying and plastic limit dentifying in the lab. After identification of mud cracks and processing, geometrical parameters such as drawing polygonal geometrical shapes between cracks, number of polygonal shapes between cracks, polygonal shapes area and their internal angels and angels between crossed cracks were measured and analysed statistically in four studied regions and other regions. In general, photos were taken in 45 spots in 4 studied regions from mud cracks and suitable scale were dedicated to the photos in order to determine geometrical parameters. Then, using image,s analysis software, geometrical parameters of each crack were measured and the average were computed

Discussion and Conclusion
Textural characteristics of samples collected from four regions in Voshmgir dam reservoirs have shown that sediments are classified in clay and silty clay zones in triangular textural diagram and CL clay in unified classification of soils and were formed in diagenetic phase. Clay mineralogy of sediments include 10% cholorite, 40% illite, 30 % vermiculite and 20% kaolinite. Clay minerals of samples were originated in east of Golestan loesses.
From geometric point of view, cracks had an average of 6.7 sides, 10 cm length of each sides and 307 cm2 area. Mean internal angle was 125 ° and total internal angles 836 °. From superficial aspect, there is a good correlation between studied mud cracks polygones and an ordered polygon. Heterogeneity in angles relations was due to curve forming in sides crossed areas after forming cracks which were related to crack age so the older the cracks become, the angel between sides is more similar to a curve.
Comparing mean geometric parameters in four studied regions have shown that first generation cracks are different from each other in geometric aspects. Due to F.distribution, P.Value and means diagram, cracks parameters and polygons in S1, S2 and S3 areas were the same but S4 characteristic parameters especially total internal angle and each sides length have meaningful difference to the other regions due to low plastic limit and high depth of sediments in S4 area.
Studies of angels between mud cracks have shown that there are two patterns of mud cracks. Some of them are T- shaped in which the crossed angle is approximately 90 °. The other group, by creating hexagonal shapes, are Y- shaped and the angle between them are approximately 120 °. Studied samples are more similar to Y- shaped pattern with a mean angle of 114 °.

Keywords: Mud crack; Fine grain facies; Geometric; Voshmgir Dam reservoir; Golestan.

References
Amini,A ., Rezaei, H., Parsaee, R.,Teymori, J., 2006. Possiblity of clay materials in produce of type 1 and 2 irrigation channel in Golestan province, Golestan water distrrbution co.
Desbenoit, B., Galin, E., & Akkouche, S., 2005. Modeling cracks and fractures. Visual Computer, 21: 717-726.
Goehring, L., 2013. Evolving fracture patterns: columnar joints, mud cracks, and polygonal terrain. Applied Clay Science, 40 (3):103-118.
Goehring, L., Conroy, R., Akhter, A., William, J., Clegg, W.J., & Routh, A.F., 2010. Evolution of mud-crack patterns during repeated drying cycles. Applied Clay Sciences, 37: 89-97.
Velde, M., 1999. Structure of surface cracks in soil and muds. Geoderma, 93: 101-124.
Vogel, H.J., Hoffmann, H., Leopold, A., & Roth, K., 2005. Studies of crack dynamics in clay soil: II. A physically based model for crack formation. Geoderma, 125: 213–223.
Zhao, Z., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, Q., 2014. Growth patterns and dynamics of mud cracks at different digenetic stages and its geological significance. International Journal of Sediment Research, 29: 82-98.

Keywords

• Mud crack
• Fine grain facies
• Geometric
• Voshmgir Dam reservoir
• Golestan

---

References

امینی، آ.، رضایی، ح.، پارسایی، ر.، تیموری، ج.، 1385. امکان سنجی استفاده از مصالح رسی در ساخت کانال‌های آبیاری درجه 1و2 استان گلستان. شرکت توزیع و بهره‌برداری از آب گلستان.

پاک، ع.، صمیمی، س.، 1391. ارزیابی رویکردهای مختلف در پیش‌بینی الگوهای ترک در عملیات ایجاد شکاف هیدرولیکی در مخازن نفتی و ارائه یک رویکرد جدید. مجله پژوهش نفت، 72: 58 ـ 73.

خوشروان آذر، م ر.، صالحی، و.، 1386. تعیین ابعاد ترک سطحی بر مبنای معیار LBB در مواد ناهمسان. پانزدهمین کنفرانس سالانه مهندسی مکانیک.

قزوینیان، ع.، نوروزی، پ.، 1392. مطالعه آزمایشگاهی انتشار ترک در نمونه‌های با درزه بسته و باز تحت بارگذاری تک‌محوری. مجله عمران مدرس، 13: 75 ـ 87 .

میرزایی نصیرآباد، ح.، کاکایی، ر.، حسنی، ب.، جلالی، س.، 1388. ارزیابی دو معیار شکست مبتنی بر ضرایب تمرکز تنش و مؤلفه‌های تنش برای پیش‌بینی جهت انتشار ترک در محیط‌های شبه سنگی. مهندسی معدن، 4 (8): 1-12.

میرزایی نصیرآباد، ح.، کاکایی، ر.، حسنی، ب.، جلالی، س.، 1391. مطالعه آزمایشگاهی تأثیر آرایش ترک‌ها در رفتار شکست نمونه‌های شبه سنگی تحت بارگذاری فشاری تک ‌محوری. مکانیک سازه‌ها و شاره ها، 2 (1): 23 ـ 34.

Behal, J., & Solodyankin, K., 2012. Crack growth simulation in the course of industrial equipment life extension. 20th SVSFEM ANSYS Users Group Meeting and Conference, 9 p.

Bohn, S., 2005. Hierarchical crack pattern as formed by successive domain divisions. II. From disordered to deterministic behavior. Physical Review, 71: 046215-1 -046215-7.

Carter, B.J., Wawrzynek, P.A., & Ingraffea, A.R., 2003. Automated 3D Crack Growth Simulation. NASA (NAG-1-1184): 1-40.

Desbenoit, B., Galin, E., & Akkouche, S., 2005. Modeling cracks and fractures. Visual Computer, 21: 717-726.

El-Maarry, M.R., Watters, W., MckKeown, N., Carter, J., Noe Dobrea, E., Bishope, J., Pommerol, A., & Tomas, N., 2014. Potential desiccation cracks on Mars: A synthesis from modeling, Analog-field studies and global observations. Icarus, 241: 268-448.

Fischer, L.L., & Beltz, G.L., 1999. Effect of crack geometry on dislocation nucleation and cleavage thresholds. Materials Research Society Symposium, 539: 57-62.

Gobron, S., & Chiba, N., 2001. Crack pattern simulation based on 3D surface cellular automata. Visual Computer, 17: 287–309.

Goehring, L., 2013. Evolving fracture patterns: columnar joints, mud cracks, and polygonal terrain. Applied Clay Science, 40 (3):103-118.

Goehring, L., Conroy, R., Akhter, A., William, J., Clegg, W.J., & Routh, A.F., 2010. Evolution of mud-crack patterns during repeated drying cycles. Applied Clay Sciences, 37: 89-97.

Harris, R.C., 2004. Giant desiccation cracks in Arizona, Arizona geological survey. Open file report, 93p.

Jones, R., Wallbrink, C., Molent, L., & Pitt, S., 2006. A Multiscale approach to crack growth. Monash University, Air Vehicles Division, DSTO, 84p.

Le, J.L., Bazant, Z.P., & Bazant, M.Z., 2009. Subcritical crack growth law and its consequences for life time statistics and size effect of quasi brittle structures. Journal Physics D: Applied Physics, 42: 2140-2148.

Morgan, P.G., 1959. The geometry of surface cracks. Applied Science Research, 9: 148- 152.

Oda, M., 1986. Stereology on crack geometry. In: Research of pattern Formation. Tokyo, Japan: KTK Scientific Publishers, p.517-553

Preston S., Griffiths B.S., & Young, I.M., 1997. An investigation into sources of soil crack heterogeneity using fractal geometry. Journal of Soil Science, 48: 31–37.

Pugno, N., Ciavarella, M., Cornetti, P., & Carpinteri, A., 2006. A generalized Paris law for fatigue crack growth. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 54: 1333-1349.

Ritchie, R.O., 2005. Incomplete self-similarity and fatigue-crack growth. International Journal of Fracture, 132: 197–203.

Selen, F., & Turer, D., 2011. Factors Effecting Mud Crack Formation in Ankara Clay, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 56: 166- 167.

Trombetta, G.L., 2011. Facies analysis, geometry and architecture of a Carnian carbonate platform: The Settsass/Rechitcture reef system (Dolomites, Southern Alps, Northern Italy). Geological of Application, 8: 56-75.

Velde, M., 1999. Structure of surface cracks in soil and muds. Geoderma, 93: 101-124.

Vethe, S., 2012. Numerical simulation of fatigue crack growth, The Norwegian university of Science and technology department of engineering design and materials. Unpublished thesis, 36 p.

Vikram, N., & Kumar, R., 2013. Review on Fatigue-Crack Growth and Finite Element Method. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4 (4): 833- 843.

Vogel, H.J., Hoffmann, H., Leopold, A., & Roth, K., 2005. Studies of crack dynamics in clay soil: II. A physically based model for crack formation. Geoderma, 125: 213–223.

Wang, Z., & Nakamura, T., 2004. Simulations of crack propagation in elastic-plastic graded materials. Mechanics of Materials, 36: 601- 622.

Zafosnik, B., Ren, Z., Ulbin, M & Flasker, J., 2007. Evaluation of stress intensity factors using finite elements. Engineering Geology, 32: 134-145.

Zhao, Z., Guo, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Zhang, Q., 2014. Growth patterns and dynamics of mud cracks at different digenetic stages and its geological significance. International Journal of Sediment Research, 29: 82-98.