Variety of shell concentrations in Aitamir Formation and their distribution in sequence stratigraphic framework in Amirabad anticline-Northeast Mashhad

Document Type : مقالات پژوهشی

Authors

• Hamed Mohammadian ¹
• Mohammad Hossein Mahmoudi Gharaie ¹
• Asadallah Mahboobi ¹
• Seed Reza Moussavi-Harami ¹
• Aram Baytgol ²

¹ Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

² Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS)

10.22067/sed.facies.v8i2.12748

Abstract

Intoduction
Descriptive analysis of shell beds is a useful tool within the context of the sequence stratigraphic model (Holland, 2000, 2001; Parras and Casadío, 2005; Cantalamessa et al., 2005; Di Celma et al., 2005). The formation and distribution of shell concentrations in the stratigraphic section are directly controlled by biogenic production and rate of background sedimentation (Kidwell, 1991a,b). Mid-Cretaceous shallow marine of the Albian-Cenomanian Aitamir Formation from the Kopet-Dagh basin of northeast Iran are rich in shell concentration dominated by bivalves especially Oyster, with minor admixture of gastropod, brachiopod and ammonite. The present paper focuses on Mid-Cretaceous shallow marine Aitamir Formation from the Kopet-Dagh basin with a twofold purpose: firstly, to reconstruct the sequence stratigraphic framework of this formation; secondly, to discuss the results in terms of the interpretation of the paleoecology and taphonomy of the shell beds occurring within this formation. The Aitamir Formation was studied bed-by-bed, both sedimentologically and taphonomically. Physical sedimentological studies attributes (thickness, lateral extent, geometry, stratigraphic contacts, association with significant surface, and position within depositional sequence) as well as vertical trends and stacking patterns, were all integrated to define and interpret facies and facies associations. Taphonomical attributes involves taxonomic composition, life habits, orientation, fragmentation, abrasion, disarticulation, encrustation, bioerosion, and microarchitecture (Kidwell, 1991a,b; Fürsich, 1995; Fürsich and Oschmann, 1993).

Discussion
A stratigraphic and sedimentologic study of the entire sedimentary succession indicated that sedimentary facies recur in consistent deepening–shallowing third-order transgressive–regressive patterns that represent a depositional sequence in which forced regressive (FRST) and lowstand system tract (LST) deposits are not present. Based on taphonomic and sedimentological observations, these shell concentrations belong to six assemblages, including; (1) fair weather wave concentration; (2) storm wave concentration; (3) distal tempestite or distal storm flow concentration; (4( primary biogenic or polyspecific concentrations; (5) winnowed concentration; (6) transgressive lag concentration. They represent a range of environments but are mainly shallow water settings. Together with sedimentologic characteristics, these fossiliferous levels are important indicators of facies architecture and, therefore, are useful tools for interpreting sequence stratigraphy. These shell concentrations are found in distinct positions within the depositional sequence: as a transgressive lags at the base of the transgressive systems tract (TST), in the maximum flooding zone (MFZ), and at or close to the top of the highstand systems tract (HST). Characteristic features of concentrations at the base of the TSTs are distinct basal erosional surface (ravinement surface), moderate time-averaging, sorting, a preferred convex-up orientation, fragmented and abraded with a chaotic orientation, and nearly total disarticulation of shells. They are suggestive of an environment (shoreface) in which reworking and local transports were frequent events. These concentrations, which form just seaward of the area of active wave ravinement, are condensed deposits resulting from general conditions of low terrigenous sediment input within high-energy settings and record stratal convergence at the costal onlap (Parras and Casadío, 2005; Cantalamessa et al., 2005; Di Celma et al., 2005). Similar features are shown by concentrations near the tops of the HSTs, except that they do not show ravinement surface and their shells were largely concentrated in lenses and in pavements rather than in beds as in the transgressive lags. Associated sedimentary structures indicate deposition above fair weather wave base in a high-energy environment. Concentrations occurring in the MFZ, in contrast, are autochthonous and highly time-averaged, having accumulated during times of low rates of sedimentation below storm wave base. Therefore, they are useful tools for defining depositional sequences.

Results
The present study documents shell concentrations from the Albian-Cenomanian Aitamir Formation (from the Kopet-Dagh basin of northeast Iran) in the background of overall sediment deposition and highlights taphonomic attributes of the shell concentrations and examines their mode of occurrence in sequence stratigraphic framework of the succession. Based on the results of this study, the complexities of shell concentrations can be resolved with the help of sedimentologic and taphonomic attributes of individual skeletal elements and their mode of occurrence in sequence stratigraphic framework. Based on taphonomic and sedimentological observations, shell concentrations are classified as lag, event, composite/multi-event and hiatal types. Overall, the shell concentrations occupy the basal part of the sequence i.e. upper part of the transgressive systems tract (TST), the middle part of the sequence or the maximum flooding zone (MFZ), and close to the top of the highstand systems tract (HST). Lag concentrations are found in the lower part of the sequence as a transgressive lags at the base of the transgressive systems tract (type 6) while winnowed concentrations (type 5), the major contributors in the sequence, occur in upper part of the highstand systems tract and in the middle part of the transgressive systems tract. The hiatal concentrations (type 4; primary biogenic concentrations) are associated with maximum flooding surface while the position of event concentrations (type 1, 2 and 3) is independent of sequence stratigraphic framework.

Keywords: shell concentration; sequence stratigraphy; Aitamir Formation; Albian-Cenomanian.

References
Cantalamessa, G., Di Celma, C., Ragaini, L., 2005. Sequence stratigraphy of the middle unit of the Jama Formation (Early Pleistocene, Ecuador): insights from integrated sedimentologic, taphonomic and paleoecologic analysis of molluskan shell concentrations. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 216: 1–25.
Di Celma, C., Ragaini, L., Cantalamessa,G., Landini,W., 2005. Basin physiography and tectonic influence on sequence architecture and stacking pattern: Pleistocene succession of the Canoa Basin (central Ecuador). Geological Society of America Bulletin, 117: 1226–1241.
Fürsich, F.T., 1995. Shell concentrations. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 88: 643–655.
Fürsich, F.T., Oschmann, W., 1993. Shell beds as tool in facies analysis: The Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 150: 169–185
Fürsich, F.T., Werner, W., & Schneider, S., 2009. Autochthonous to parautochthonous bivalve concentrations within transgressive marginal marine strata of the Upper Jurassic of Portugal. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 89: 161–190.
Holland, S.M., 2000. The qualitiy of the fossil record: a sequence stratrigraphic perspective. In: Erwin, D.H., & Wing, S.L., (eds.), Deep time: paleobiology’s perspective. The Paleontological Society, Lawrence, KS, pp. 148– 168.
Holland, S.M., 2001. Sequence stratigraphy and fossils. In: Briggs, D.E.G., & Crowther, P.R., (eds.), Palaeobiology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2: 548– 553.
Kidwell, S.M. 1991b. Taphonomic feedback (live/dead interactions) in the genesis of bioclastic beds: keys to reconstructing sedimentary dynamics. In: Einsele, G., Ricken, W., & Seilacher, A., (eds.), Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 268–282.
Kidwell, S.M., 1991a. The stratigraphy of shell concentrations. In: Allison, P.A., & Briggs, D.E.G., (eds.), Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Topics in Geobiology, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 115–129.
Parras, A., Casadío, S., 2005. Taphonomy and sequence stratigraphic significance of oyster dominated concentrations from the San Julián formation, Oligocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 217: 47–66.

Keywords

• Shell concentration
• Sequence stratigraphy
• Aitamir Formation
• Albian-Cenomanian

---

References

شرفی، م.، محبوبی، ا.، موسوی حرمی، ر.، نجفی، م.، 1390. کاربرد لایه‌های پرفسیل در تفسیر چینه‌نگاری سکانسی سازند آیتامیر در ناودیسهای شیخ و بی‌بهره، باختر کپه‌داغ. فصلنامه زمین‌شناسی ایران، 17: 31-47.

Abbott, S.T, 1997. Mid-cycle shell beds from Mid-Pleistocene cyclothems, New Zealand: implications for sequence architecture. Sedimentology, 44: 805–824.

Aigner, T., 1982. Calcareous tempestites: storm-dominated stratification in Upper Muschelkalk limestones (Triassic, SW-Germany). In: Einsele, G., & Seilacher, A., (eds.), Cyclic and Event Stratification. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 180-198.

Banerjee, I., & Kidwell, S.M., 1991. Significance of molluscan shell beds in sequence stratigraphy: an example from the Lower Cretaceous Mannville Group of Canada. Sedimentology, 38: 913-934.

Baum, G.R., & Vail, P.R., 1988. Sequence stratigraphic concepts applied to Paleogene outcrops, Gulf and Atlantic basins. In: Wilgus, C.K., Hastings, B.S., Kendall, C.G., Posamentier, H.W., Ross, C.A., & Van Wagoner, J.C., (eds.), Sea-level changes: an integrated approach. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists (SEPM), 42: 302– 327.

Brown, L.F., & Fisher, W.L., 1977. Seismic-stratigraphic interpretation of depositional systems: Examples from Brazilian rift and pull-apart basins. In: Payton, C.E., (ed.), Seismic Stratigraphy-applications to hydrocarbon exploration, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 26: 213-248.

Catuneanu, O., 2006. Principles of Sequence stratigraphy (1st Edition). Elsevier, Oxford, 374p.

Dunham R.J, 1962. Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham, W.E., (ed.) Classification of Carbonate Rocks. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 1: 108–121.

Embry, A.F.I., & Klovan, J.E., 1971. Absolute water depth limits of Late Devonian paleoecological zones. Geology Rundsch, 61: 672-686.

Fürsich, F.T., Oschmann, W., 1993. Shell beds as tool in facies analysis: The Jurassic of Kachchh, western India. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 150: 169–185

Fürsich, F.T., Werner, W., & Schneider, S., 2009. Autochthonous to parautochthonous bivalve concentrations within transgressive marginal marine strata of the Upper Jurassic of Portugal. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, 89: 161–190.

Fürsich, F.T., 1995. Shell concentrations. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 88: 643–655.

Holland, S.M., 2000. The qualitiy of the fossil record: a sequence stratrigraphic perspective. In: Erwin, D.H., & Wing, S.L., (eds.), Deep time: paleobiology’s perspective. The Paleontological Society, Lawrence, KS, pp. 148– 168.

Holland, S.M., 2001. Sequence stratigraphy and fossils. In: Briggs, D.E.G., & Crowther, P.R., (eds.), Palaeobiology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2: 548– 553.

Hunter, R.E., & Clifton, H.E., 1982. Cyclic deposits and hummocky cross-stratification of probable storm origin in Upper Cretaceous rocks of the Cape Sebastian area, southwestern Oregon. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 52: 127-143.

Kidwell, S.M., & Holland, S.M., 1991. Field description of coarse bioclastic debris. Palaios, 6: 426–434.

Kidwell, S.M., 1991a. The stratigraphy of shell concentrations. In: Allison, P.A., & Briggs, D.E.G., (eds.), Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Topics in Geobiology, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 115–129.

Kidwell, S.M. 1991b. Taphonomic feedback (live/dead interactions) in the genesis of bioclastic beds: keys to reconstructing sedimentary dynamics. In: Einsele, G., Ricken, W., & Seilacher, A., (eds.), Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 268–282.

MacEachern, J.A., Bechtel, D.J., & Pemberton, S.G., 1992. Ichnology and sedimentology of transgressive deposits, transgressively-related deposits and transgressive systems tracts in the Viking Formation of Alberta. In: Pemberton, S.G., (ed.), Applications of Ichnology to Petroleum Exploration, A Core Workshop. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Core Workshop 17: 251-290.

Nelson, C.H., 1982. Modern shallow-water graded sand layers from storm surges, Bering Shelf: a mimic of bouma sequence and turbidite systems. Journal of sedimentary Petrology, 52: 537-545.

Pemberton, S.G., & MacEachern, J.A., 1995. The sequence stratigraphic significance of trace fossils: examples from the Cretaceous foreland basin of Alberta. In: Van Wagoner, J.C., & Bertram, G., (eds.), Sequence Stratigraphy of Foreland Basin Deposits, outcrop and subsurface examples from the Cretaceous of North America. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, 64: 429-470.

Plint, A.G., & Nummedal, D., 2000. The falling stage systems tract: recognition and importance in sequence stratigraphic analysis. In: Hunt, D., & Gawthorpe, R.L. (eds.), Sedimentary Response to Forced Regression. Geological Society of London, Special Publication, 172: 1–17.

Salazar-Jimenez, A., Frey, R.W., & Howard, J.D., 1982. Concavity orientations of bivalve shells in estuarine and nearshore shelf sediments, Georgia. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 52: 565–586.

Seilacher, A., 1992. Dynamic taphonomy: the process-related view of fossil-lagerstaetten. In: Fernandez-Lopez, S., (ed.), Conferencias de la Reunion de Tafonomia y Fosilizacion. Editorial Complutense, Madrid, pp. 109– 125.

Van Wagoner, J.C., Mitchum, R.M.Jr., Campion, K.M., & Rahmanian, V.D., (1990). Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, core, and outcrops: concepts for high-resolution corre-lation of time and facies. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Methods in Exploration Series 7: 1-55.